Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
Date: 1998-02-01 23:29:59
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980201192852.12562V-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > I just increased it...when we didn't have the patches list, I had
> > increased hackers, but just switched it around:
> >
> > # maxlength [integer] (40000) <resend,digest>
> > # The maximum size of an unapproved message in characters. When
> > # used with digest, a new digest will be automatically generated if
> > # the size of the digest exceeds this number of characters.
> > maxlength = 4000000
>
> Gee, that is taking all the fun out of finding the limit myself. :-)

I could add a random number generator to the code from 1->4000000
that changes each time an email is sent, just so that it became a game of
(excuse Vadim) Russian Roulette? :)

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message teunis 1998-02-02 00:16:45 (: JDBC+(Sun ~3:pm MST) CVS :) -also question about regression tests
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-01 22:41:45 psort fixed