Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
Date: 1998-02-01 22:26:01
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980201182256.12562U-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >
> > On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Peter T Mount wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Has anyone seen the jdbc patch I posted earlier today?
> > >
> > > If not, I'll ftp it.
> >
> > I haven't seen it...send me a copy directly? The mailing lists
> > have '# of lines' limits to messages, which may have been where it got
> > lost...
>
> Wonder what the limit is? Let me find out by trial and error... :-)

I just increased it...when we didn't have the patches list, I had
increased hackers, but just switched it around:

# maxlength [integer] (40000) <resend,digest>
# The maximum size of an unapproved message in characters. When
# used with digest, a new digest will be automatically generated if
# the size of the digest exceeds this number of characters.
maxlength = 4000000

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-01 22:37:53 Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-01 22:12:33 Re: [PATCHES] Was the jdbc patch received?