Re: [HACKERS] PostGreSQL v6.2.1 for Linux Alpha

From: "Kenji T(dot) Hollis" <khollis(at)Gawain(dot)Houston-InterWeb(dot)COM>
To: Ryan Kirkpatrick <rkirkpat(at)nag(dot)cs(dot)colorado(dot)edu>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Jeff Sturm <jsturm(at)zenacomp(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostGreSQL v6.2.1 for Linux Alpha
Date: 1998-02-15 02:15:59
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.95.980215021202.11279A-100000@Gawain.Houston-InterWeb.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ryan:

> As for you, Kenji, (not to be a jerk, but instead a reality
> check) just calm down and be patient, or jump in and
> help us (i.e. email Jeff and ask him what you can do to help, or get a
> new version of pgsql, apply the patch included in this email, and report
> back to us what happens). Nothing gets done by people continously asking
> for something to be done. And anyway, porting to the alpha, a 64bit
> architecture is not simple to say the very least. Add to that, a very
> large (I think 100k+ lines of code has been stated before) and powerful
> database to port, and things reach the near impossible point. We will get
> it figured out in due time, but we don't have 50 programmers working away
> at this all day long. Then again, you are not paying anything for the
> database. So I think things are fair. :)

I totally understand where you're coming from, however, I wrote over 4
months ago reporting the problem, and was kind of brushed off like it was
a non-issue, and I reported it twice. Same thing twice. Finally, I raise
hell about it and I get a response. I'm not impatient. I am currently
using msql for what I need and it seems to be getting the job done. I
just need somethimg much more powerful. PostGres is much more powerful.

I'm trying to help, but the first message I get was from some idiot on
this list who told me to fix the problem myself and quit whining. I don't
take kindly to people who write messages like those to me, especially when
I'm trying to help resolve an issue with the coders. I don't deserve to
be treated with this disrespect, and I never shoot back at any question I
get - the most I'll do is delete the message and bite my damn tongue.

So, now that you understand my position, I just wanted an update, and
wanted to help fix the problem.

> PS. Kenji, where did you get that pgsql would be running on Linux/Alpha in
> Jan '98? I have never seen any such projected date!

One of the coders told me this privately. I wish I had saved that
message!

-- Ken
------
=========================================================================
Houston InterWeb Design, Inc. || Office: +1 (713) 627-9494
Lead Programmer/Designer || Fax: +1 (713) 627-2744
C++, Windows, and Web Programming || Pager: +1 (713) 727-2529
=========================================================================
Home page URL: http://www.houston-interweb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-15 02:27:45 Massimo assistance
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-02-15 01:19:49 Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] Valid ports for v6.3 -- NetBSD/i386 compile errors