| From: | Jim Carroll <jim(at)carroll(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: [INTERFACES] Postgres Limitations |
| Date: | 1999-02-03 02:50:14 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSD.3.91.990202214643.2669A-100000@apollo.carroll.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Jackson, DeJuan wrote:
> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 14:29:53 -0600
> From: Jackson, DeJuan <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
> To: Jim Carroll <jim(at)carroll(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Postgres Limitations
>
> It is currently unclear as to what will happen when you table reaches 2G
> of storage on most file systems. I think that >2G table handling got
> broken somehow.
I know this is probably a "loaded" question, but do have any idea what
might be the cause of this limitation ? Are there any FAQ's, docs or source
code references we could follow up to see about solving this problem ?
We are looking to create an index for 70 Million records. My quick
calculations show we will have a single table larger than 15GB.
---
Jim C., President | C A R R O L L - N E T, Inc.
201-488-1332 | New Jersey's Premier Internet Service Provider
www.carroll.com |
| Want to grow your business and at the same
| time, decrease costs? Ask about the
www.message-server.com | Carroll-Net Message Server.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Harvey | 1999-02-03 05:32:51 | Re: LinuxODBC |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-02-02 23:00:35 | Re: [INTERFACES] shared libs(tcl/swig/ecpg/postgresql) |