From: | <ghaverla(at)freenet(dot)edmonton(dot)ab(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Jason Hihn <jhihn(at)paytimepayroll(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Pgsql-Novice(at)Postgresql(dot) Org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ideal Hardware? |
Date: | 2003-10-02 00:19:21 |
Message-ID: | Pine.A41.3.95.1031001180900.53904A-100000@fn2.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jason Hihn wrote:
> We have an opportunity to purchase a new, top-notch database server. I am
> wondering what kind of hardware is recommended? We're on Linux platforms and
> kernels though.
[...]
> The configuration that is going on in my head is:
> RAID 1, 200gig
> 1 server, 4g ram
> Linux 2.6
I vaguely remember someone (Tom?) mentioning that one of the log
files probably might want to go on its own partition. Sometime in
the last 2 weeks. I am not pushing dbase stuff here, but my
system is about your size. About 120 GB of my disk is RAID
on a promiseware card, using the kernel software RAID (apparently
software RAID on Linux is faster than the promisecard does it
in hardware). I have a bunch of different things using software
RAID:
/tmp is a RAID 0 with ext2
/home is a RAID 5 with ext3
/usr, /var, /usr/local is RAID 10 with ext3
/var/lib/postgres is on a real SCSI 10k, on ext3 with noatime
So, my postgres isn't on the RAID(s). I just got finished
rebuilding my RAIDs for the second time (failed disk). I ended
up rebuilding things in single user mode, so I can't set tasks in
parallel. I don't know if you can do this in multi-user mode
and/or in parallel. I'm being paranoid. Rebuilding RAID 5 is
fast, rebuilding RAID 1 is a pain in the butt! My biggest RAID 10
is about 10 GB, bundling the new partition from the new disk into
the RAID 0 is fast, rebuilding the mirror (RAID 1 part) takes 10
hours! Dual athlon 1.6's and 1 GB of RAM, so I have lots of
horsepower. Maybe you are going with better RAID than I have,
but it seems to me that RAID 5 (with spares) is going to be better
if you ever have to rebuild.
Gord
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-02 01:10:31 | Re: Ideal Hardware? |
Previous Message | David Rickard | 2003-10-01 23:21:46 | Strange Startup Behavior |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-02 01:10:31 | Re: Ideal Hardware? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-01 22:23:12 | Re: TPC-R benchmarks |