From: | "Markus Gieppner" <viking(at)mgfint(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Henry" <hxzhang(at)cs(dot)ualberta(dot)ca>, "PostgreSQL -jdbc" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: alternative to postgresql |
Date: | 2002-02-21 17:18:52 |
Message-ID: | PGEOJKHIIDNBGCBBNPOAMEAKGHAA.viking@mgfint.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Henry,
You might want to take a look at SAPDB (www.sapdb.org) the open-source db
from SAP AG. Runs really great, scales well, also on Windows, has lots and
lots of features (transactions, constraints, triggers, stored procedures,
subqueries, no vacuuming, query by example, visual queries, dynamic growing
etc. etc. ), 600+ page documentation, an SQL client for Windows, a C
precompiler, a webserver, replication manager, wonderful support people
(online) and a small but steadily growing group of users, mainly in Europe.
On some edges it's still a bit rough, but that makes it only more charming.
Interfaces are available for ODBC, Perl, Python, PHP and JDBC. It's totally
free, even for commercial applications.
Another option, also not too known, and which runs nicely on Windows, is
Intersystems Cache (www.intersystems.com) . It's commercial and proprietary,
but they recently lowered their pricing (starts now in the range of $3000,
correct me if I'm wrong..., with a free download for developpers ). It's a
postrelational database offering best of both worlds (RDBMS + OO) and
multi-dimensional; and apparently scales and performs extremely well under
heavy load. It integrates an application server into the database, and
allows pretty easy development of webapplications (using Cache Server Pages,
JSP, ASP, Perl etc.). Installation on Windows is extremly simple, within 5
minutes you have it integrated into IIS and running. I haven't tried it on
Solaris or Linux yet. Cache is mainly used in the health industry but their
most prominent client is Ameritrade. According to an independent study it
outperforms Oracle in several quite important areas - not only in regards of
pricing!
With all respect for PostGreSQL - but if you are on Windows and don't want
to go through the hassles of Cygwin you should definitely take them into
consideration.
Markus Gieppner
........................................
MGF International Inc., New York
Webapplications - Ecommerce - Publishing
(1) 212-477 5399
........................................
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Henry
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:19 PM
To: PostgreSQL -jdbc
Subject: [JDBC] alternative to postgresql
Hi,
My boss found postgresql is not as easy as MS-ACCESS in that postgresql is
mainly
deployed on unix/linux side, and deploying on windows platform is
particulously troublesome. that means the company has to spend more dollars
for a linux server for that
database. i know some alternative as MySQL, but i heard that product
doesn't support
nested query, no updatable view, no outter join, etc. so are there any
better tools around
as easy, quick, yet powerful DB candidate?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com)
Version: 6.0.324 / Virus Database: 181 - Release Date: 2/14/2002
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com)
Version: 6.0.324 / Virus Database: 181 - Release Date: 2/14/2002
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug Fields | 2002-02-21 17:38:08 | Re: alternative to postgresql - PostgreSQL Windows |
Previous Message | TimothyReaves | 2002-02-21 16:42:25 | JDBC Driver questions |