From: | "Carlos H(dot) Reimer" <carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, "Brad Nicholson" <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction |
Date: | 2006-11-28 19:01:25 |
Message-ID: | PEEPKDFEHHEMKBBFPOOKMEAIDKAA.carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance |
Hi,
There is an article about "Lowering the priority of a PostgreSQL query"
(http://weblog.bignerdranch.com/?p=11) that explains how to use the
setpriority() to lower PostgreSQL processes.
I?m wondering how much effective it would be for i/o bound systems.
Will the setpriority() system call affect i/o queue too?
Reimer
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:jim(at)nasby(dot)net]
> Enviada em: domingo, 26 de novembro de 2006 22:52
> Para: Brad Nicholson
> Cc: carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br; pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Assunto: Re: [PERFORM] Priority to a mission critical transaction
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:40:15PM -0500, Brad Nicholson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 21:43 -0200, Carlos H. Reimer wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We have an application that is mission critical, normally very fast,
> > > but when an I/O or CPU bound transaction appears, the mission critical
> > > application suffers. Is there a way go give some kind of priority to
> > > this kind of application?
> > > Reimer
> >
> >
> > Not that I'm aware of. Depending on what the problems transactions are,
> > setting up a replica on a separate machine and running those
> > transactions against the replica might be the solution.
>
> The BizGres project has been working on resource quotas, which might
> eventually evolve to what you're looking for.
> --
> Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-28 19:07:05 | Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction |
Previous Message | Roderick A. Anderson | 2006-11-28 18:54:43 | Re: Collateral for LISA 06 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-28 19:07:05 | Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction |
Previous Message | J. Andrew Rogers | 2006-11-28 16:51:05 | Re: Postgres scalability and performance on windows |