From: | "Carlos H(dot) Reimer" <carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Pgsql-General(at)Postgresql(dot)Org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RES: RES: RES: RES: Dates rejected |
Date: | 2006-10-17 02:23:04 |
Message-ID: | PEEPKDFEHHEMKBBFPOOKGEMEDFAA.carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yes, it is the 8.0.8 version.
You mean that changes to /etc/localtime should not reflect in the
to_timestamp behavior? Strange, why does to_timestamp behavior changed here
when the /etc/localtime was overlaped?
Well, maybe the PG refresh I´ve done after changing the /etc/localtime did
it (pg_ctl restart).
Anyway, if it will not look at the /etc/localtime, how PG will discover the
DST changes?
Thank you in advance!
Carlos
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Enviada em: terça-feira, 17 de outubro de 2006 00:02
> Para: carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br
> Cc: Pgsql-General(at)Postgresql(dot)Org
> Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [GENERAL] Dates rejected
>
>
> "Carlos H. Reimer" <carlos(dot)reimer(at)opendb(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> > To discover if it works this way I´ve changed the
> /etc/localtime to relect
> > the following timezone:
>
> Um ... what PG version are you working with? 8.0 and up don't pay
> attention to /etc/localtime, because they have their own timezone info.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2006-10-17 02:56:54 | Aother tablespace permission issue (was Re: Permission problem ...) |
Previous Message | Leonel Nunez | 2006-10-17 02:05:38 | Re: Permission problem with create tablespace |