RE: Fix pg_publication_tables to exclude generated columns

From: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Fix pg_publication_tables to exclude generated columns
Date: 2023-01-10 03:08:04
Message-ID: OSZPR01MB631086F865D698657F65B301FDFF9@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 11:06 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 5:29 PM shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> > <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I think one way to fix it is to modify pg_publication_tables query to exclude
> >> generated columns. But in this way, we need to bump catalog version when
> fixing
> >> it in back-branch. Another way is to modify function
> >> pg_get_publication_tables()'s return value to contain all supported columns
> if
> >> no column list is specified, and we don't need to change system view.
>
> > That sounds like a reasonable approach to fix the issue.
>
> We could just not fix it in the back branches. I'd argue that this is
> as much a definition change as a bug fix, so it doesn't really feel
> like something to back-patch anyway.
>

If this is not fixed in back-branch, in some cases we will get an error when
creating/refreshing subscription because we query pg_publication_tables in
column list check.

e.g.

-- publisher
CREATE TABLE test_mix_4 (a int PRIMARY KEY, b int, c int, d int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a + 1) STORED);
CREATE PUBLICATION pub_mix_7 FOR TABLE test_mix_4 (a, b, c);
CREATE PUBLICATION pub_mix_8 FOR TABLE test_mix_4;

-- subscriber
CREATE TABLE test_mix_4 (a int PRIMARY KEY, b int, c int, d int);

postgres=# CREATE SUBSCRIPTION sub1 CONNECTION 'port=5432' PUBLICATION pub_mix_7, pub_mix_8;
ERROR: cannot use different column lists for table "public.test_mix_4" in different publications

I think it might be better to fix it in back-branch. And if we fix it by
modifying pg_get_publication_tables(), we don't need to bump catalog version in
back-branch, I think this seems acceptable.

Regards,
Shi yu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2023-01-10 03:24:33 Re: BUG: Postgres 14 + vacuum_defer_cleanup_age + FOR UPDATE + UPDATE
Previous Message Richard Guo 2023-01-10 03:07:09 Re: Allow DISTINCT to use Incremental Sort