From: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Date: | 2022-05-13 09:57:15 |
Message-ID: | OSZPR01MB63106EADF50E0E710D36CE5DFDCA9@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 6, 2022 4:56 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here are my review comments for v5-0002 (TAP tests)
>
> Your changes followed a similar pattern of refactoring so most of my
> comments below is repeated for all the files.
>
Thanks for your comments.
> ======
>
> 1. Commit message
>
> For the tap tests about streaming option in logical replication, test both
> 'on' and 'apply' option.
>
> SUGGESTION
> Change all TAP tests using the PUBLICATION "streaming" option, so they
> now test both 'on' and 'apply' values.
>
OK. But "streaming" is a subscription option, so I modified it to:
Change all TAP tests using the SUBSCRIPTION "streaming" option, so they
now test both 'on' and 'apply' values.
> ~~~
>
> 4. src/test/subscription/t/015_stream.pl
>
> +# Test streaming mode apply
> +$node_publisher->safe_psql('postgres', "DELETE FROM test_tab WHERE (a > 2)");
> $node_publisher->wait_for_catchup($appname);
>
> I think those 2 lines do not really belong after the "# Test streaming
> mode apply" comment. IIUC they are really just doing cleanup from the
> prior test part so I think they should
>
> a) be *above* this comment (and say "# cleanup the test data") or
> b) maybe it is best to put all the cleanup lines actually inside the
> 'test_streaming' function so that the last thing the function does is
> clean up after itself.
>
> option b seems tidier to me.
>
I also think option b seems better, so I put them inside test_streaming().
The rest of the comments are fixed as suggested.
Besides, I noticed that we didn't free the background worker after preparing a
transaction in the main patch, so made some small changes to fix it.
Attach the updated patches.
Regards,
Shi yu
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v6-0001-Perform-streaming-logical-transactions-by-backgro.patch | application/octet-stream | 74.3 KB |
v6-0002-Test-streaming-apply-option-in-tap-test.patch | application/octet-stream | 64.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Japin Li | 2022-05-13 10:16:23 | Backends stunk in wait event IPC/MessageQueueInternal |
Previous Message | wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-05-13 09:41:42 | RE: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication |