RE: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber

From: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber
Date: 2022-06-21 09:10:57
Message-ID: OSZPR01MB631034C203D5F00EC189F462FDB39@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 4:49 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:50 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 3:35 PM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> > <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Attached a patch containing the above to consider as an alternative.
> >
>
> Thanks, the patch looks good to me. I'll push this after doing some testing.

The patch looks good to me as well.

I also verified that the patch can be applied cleanly on back-branches and I
confirmed that the bug exists on back branches before this patch and is fixed
after applying this patch. The regression tests also passed with and without
RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE option in my machine.

Regards,
Shi yu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2022-06-21 09:22:56 Re: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-06-21 08:49:01 Re: Replica Identity check of partition table on subscriber