From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Some codes refer slot()->{'slot_name'} but it is not defined |
Date: | 2025-04-03 03:15:06 |
Message-ID: | OSCPR01MB149667EC4E738769CA80B7EA5F5AE2@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear hackers,
Cluster.pm defines a function slot()which requires a slot_name as a key
and returns attributes of the given slot, as a hash-ref. ISTM, the hash
does not contain 'slot_name'.
However, I found that some codes access it by using a key 'slot_name'. ISTM it always
becomes 'undef' thus any tests are meaningless.
It looks like that existing codes want to check the existing of given logical slots.
So, it is enough to search with key 'plugin'. The valid value is set if exists, otherwise ''.
How do you think?
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Fix-invalid-referring-of-hash-ref-for-replication-sl.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2025-04-03 03:28:09 | Re: Reducing memory consumed by RestrictInfo list translations in partitionwise join planning |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-04-03 02:57:56 | Re: Fix slot synchronization with two_phase decoding enabled |