From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Bertrand Drouvot' <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Fix 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl race conditions |
Date: | 2025-04-01 11:52:46 |
Message-ID: | OSCPR01MB14966184B3A7DE05716026376F5AC2@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Bertrand,
> > > s/to avoid the seeing a xl_running_xacts/to avoid seeing a xl_running_xacts/?
> >
> > Fixed.
Sorry, I misunderstood your comment and wrongly fixed. I will address in next version.
> === 1
>
> + * XXX What value should we return here? Originally this
> returns the
> + * inserted location of RUNNING_XACT record. Based on that,
> here
> + * returns the latest insert location for now.
> + */
> + return GetInsertRecPtr();
>
> Looking at the LogStandbySnapshot() that are using the output lsn, i.e:
>
> pg_log_standby_snapshot()
> BackgroundWriterMain()
> ReplicationSlotReserveWal()
>
> It looks ok to me to use GetInsertRecPtr().
>
> But if we "really" want to produce a "new" WAL record, what about using
> LogLogicalMessage()? It could also be used for debugging purpose. Bonus point:
> it does not need wal_level to be set to logical. Thoughts?
Right. Similarly, an SQL function pg_logical_emit_message() is sometimes used for
the testing purpose, advance_wal() and emit_wal( in Cluster.pm. Even so, we have
not found the use-case yet, thus I want to retain now and will update based on
the future needs.
I'll investigate another point [1] and then will post new version.
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | torikoshia | 2025-04-01 11:54:58 | Re: Change log level for notifying hot standby is waiting non-overflowed snapshot |
Previous Message | David Geier | 2025-04-01 11:51:18 | Hashed IN only applied to first encountered IN |