From: | "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Heikki Linnakangas' <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com" <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | RE: ResourceOwner refactoring |
Date: | 2021-01-13 01:55:15 |
Message-ID: | OSBPR01MB31575F85F7363FDA04CCE264F5A90@OSBPR01MB3157.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Heikki,
I'm also interested in this patch, but it cannot be applied to the current HEAD...
$ git apply ~/v2-0001-Make-resowners-more-easily-extensible.patch
error: patch failed: src/common/cryptohash_openssl.c:57
error: src/common/cryptohash_openssl.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/include/utils/resowner_private.h:1
error: src/include/utils/resowner_private.h: patch does not apply
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hou, Zhijie | 2021-01-13 02:06:58 | RE: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-01-13 01:48:52 | Re: A failure of standby to follow timeline switch |