From: | "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Date: | 2022-09-21 02:14:35 |
Message-ID: | OS3PR01MB62759FDEA03A901FC3BB15CF9E4F9@OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> FYI -
>
> The latest patch 30-0001 fails to apply, it seems due to a recent commit [1].
>
> [postgres(at)CentOS7-x64 oss_postgres_misc]$ git apply
> ../patches_misc/v30-0001-Perform-streaming-logical-transactions-by-
> parall.patch
> error: patch failed: src/include/replication/logicalproto.h:246
> error: src/include/replication/logicalproto.h: patch does not apply
Thanks for your kindly reminder.
I rebased the patch set and attached them in [1].
Regards,
Wang wei
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2022-09-21 02:16:07 | Re: why can't a table be part of the same publication as its schema |
Previous Message | wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-09-21 02:09:27 | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |