RE: Confused comment about drop replica identity index

From: "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Confused comment about drop replica identity index
Date: 2021-12-20 03:46:13
Message-ID: OS3PR01MB62750A0A1A282E9E0148172B9E7B9@OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:27AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2021 at 06:40AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Would you like to write a patch to address all that?
>
> OK, I will push it soon.

Here is a patch to correct wrong comment about REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX, And improve the pg-doc.

Regards,
Wang wei

Attachment Content-Type Size
Correct-wrong-comment-about-REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX.patch application/octet-stream 3.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ajin Cherian 2021-12-20 03:52:13 Re: row filtering for logical replication
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-12-20 03:26:59 Re: row filtering for logical replication