From: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: [BUG] wrong refresh when ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ADD/DROP PUBLICATION |
Date: | 2021-08-09 10:33:46 |
Message-ID: | OS3PR01MB57182DB1E934095F5076019E94F69@OS3PR01MB5718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, August 9, 2021 11:10 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 6:53 PM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 1:36 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 9:57 PM Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you mean to say that do it for both Add and Drop or just for Drop?
> > > Actually, doing it both will make the behavior consistent but doing
> > > it just for Drop might be preferable by some users. I think it is
> > > better to be consistent here but I am fine if you and others feel it
> > > is better to refresh all publications only in Drop case.
> >
> > Personally, I also think it will be better to make the behavior consistent.
> > Attach the new version patch make both ADD and DROP behave the same as
> > SET PUBLICATION which refresh all the publications.
> >
>
> There is a bug reported on pgsql-bugs [1] which seems to be happening due to
> the same reason. Can you please test that the other bug is also fixed with your
> patch?
>
> [1] -
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17132-6a702189086c6243%40postgres
> ql.org
Thanks for the reminder, I have checked and tested the reported bug.
The reported bug is that when drop and then re-add a publication on subscriber side,
the table in the publication wasn't synced. And after applying the patch here, the table
will be synced as expected if re-added(behaves the same as SET PUBLICATION).
Best regards,
Hou zj
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-08-09 10:45:32 | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-08-09 10:29:16 | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |