RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 2:41 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 3:15 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:00 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In addition of a code readability, there is a description in the doc
> > > that mentions "Stream End" but we describe "Stream Stop" in the
> > > later description, which seems a bug in the doc to me:
> > >
> >
> > Doc changes looks good to me. But, I have question for code change:
> >
> > --- a/src/include/replication/logicalproto.h
> > +++ b/src/include/replication/logicalproto.h
> > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ typedef enum LogicalRepMsgType
> > LOGICAL_REP_MSG_COMMIT_PREPARED = 'K',
> > LOGICAL_REP_MSG_ROLLBACK_PREPARED = 'r',
> > LOGICAL_REP_MSG_STREAM_START = 'S',
> > - LOGICAL_REP_MSG_STREAM_END = 'E',
> > + LOGICAL_REP_MSG_STREAM_STOP = 'E',
> > LOGICAL_REP_MSG_STREAM_COMMIT = 'c',
> >
> > As this is changing the enum name and if any extension (logical
> > replication extension) has started using it then they would require a
> > change. As this is the latest change in PG-14, so it might be okay but
> > OTOH, as this is just a code readability change, shall we do it only
> > for PG-15?
>
> I think that the doc changes could be backpatched to PG14 but I think we
> should do the code change only for PG15.

+1, and the patch looks good to me.

Best regards,
Hou zj