RE: [BUG] "FailedAssertion" reported when streaming in logical replication

From: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [BUG] "FailedAssertion" reported when streaming in logical replication
Date: 2021-04-29 06:39:41
Message-ID: OS0PR01MB6113F48EAA0020AD7F38E104FB5F9@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Thursday, April 29, 2021 3:18 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote

>I tried to think about how to write a test case for this scenario, but
>I think it will not be possible to generate an automated test case for this.
>Basically, we need 2 concurrent transactions and out of that,
>we need one transaction which just has processed only one change i.e
>XLOG_HEAP2_NEW_CID and another transaction should overflow the logical
>decoding work mem, so that we select the wrong transaction which
>doesn't have the base snapshot. But how to control that the
>transaction which is performing the DDL just write the
>XLOG_HEAP2_NEW_CID wal and before it writes any other WAL we should
>get the WAl from other transaction which overflows the buffer.

Thanks for your updating.
Actually, I tried to make the automated test for the problem, too. But made no process on this.
Agreed on your opinion " not be possible to generate an automated test case for this ".

If anyone figure out a good solution for the test automation of this case.
Please be kind to share that with us. Thanks.

Regards,
Tang

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-04-29 07:14:22 Re: SQL-standard function body
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-04-29 06:37:58 Re: Replication slot stats misgivings