From: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [BUG] "FailedAssertion" reported when streaming in logical replication |
Date: | 2021-04-29 06:39:41 |
Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB6113F48EAA0020AD7F38E104FB5F9@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday, April 29, 2021 3:18 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote
>I tried to think about how to write a test case for this scenario, but
>I think it will not be possible to generate an automated test case for this.
>Basically, we need 2 concurrent transactions and out of that,
>we need one transaction which just has processed only one change i.e
>XLOG_HEAP2_NEW_CID and another transaction should overflow the logical
>decoding work mem, so that we select the wrong transaction which
>doesn't have the base snapshot. But how to control that the
>transaction which is performing the DDL just write the
>XLOG_HEAP2_NEW_CID wal and before it writes any other WAL we should
>get the WAl from other transaction which overflows the buffer.
Thanks for your updating.
Actually, I tried to make the automated test for the problem, too. But made no process on this.
Agreed on your opinion " not be possible to generate an automated test case for this ".
If anyone figure out a good solution for the test automation of this case.
Please be kind to share that with us. Thanks.
Regards,
Tang
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-04-29 07:14:22 | Re: SQL-standard function body |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-04-29 06:37:58 | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |