| From: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | RE: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
| Date: | 2021-11-26 02:15:06 |
| Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB6113C9CAC8EF9EC21A9228D6FB639@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday, November 26, 2021 9:30 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Indeed. Attached an updated patch. Thanks!
Thanks for your patch. A small comment:
+ OID of the relation that the worker is synchronizing; null for the
+ main apply worker
Should we modify it to "OID of the relation that the worker was synchronizing ..."?
The rest of the patch LGTM.
Regards
Tang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-11-26 02:16:42 | RE: row filtering for logical replication |
| Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-11-26 01:40:21 | RE: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid |