From: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: Added schema level support for publication. |
Date: | 2021-07-23 00:56:29 |
Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB6113A758B3EE942937F39D29FBE59@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday, July 22, 2021 1:30 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue, this issue is fixed in the attached v13 patch.
> I have changed relation name pg_publication_schema to
> pg_publication_sch so that the names are in similar lines with
> pg_publication_rel relation and similar changes were done for variable
> names too.
Thanks for your fixing. The issue is fixed as you said.
After applying your V13 patch. I noticed that if I specify duplicate schema names when using "ALTER PUBLICATION ... SET SCHEMA ...", I would get the following error message:
postgres=# ALTER PUBLICATION pub1 SET SCHEMA s1,s1;
ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pg_publication_sch_psnspcid_pspubid_index"
DETAIL: Key (psnspcid, pspubid)=(16406, 16405) already exists.
I think the error message is pretty hard to understand. Maybe we can do sth to improve this scenario.
Here is two proposal:
1. Don't report error message, just add some code to make the above command to be executed successfully,
just like "ALTER PUBLICATION ... SET TABLE ..." as follolws:
postgres=# ALTER PUBLICATION pub2 SET TABLE t1,t1;
ALTER PUBLICATION
postgres=# \dRp+ pub2
Publication pub2
Owner | All tables | Inserts | Updates | Deletes | Truncates | Via root | Pubtype
----------+------------+---------+---------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
postgres | f | t | t | t | t | f | t
Tables:
"public.t1"
2. Report a easily understandable message like: Schema s1 specified more than once
Thoughts?
Regards
Tang
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-07-23 01:31:18 | Re: Slightly improve initdb --sync-only option's help message |
Previous Message | Greg Nancarrow | 2021-07-23 00:26:16 | Re: logical replication empty transactions |