RE: Added schema level support for publication.

From: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Added schema level support for publication.
Date: 2021-10-19 05:53:25
Message-ID: OS0PR01MB6113852959047CE53818EC4CFBBD9@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday, October 19, 2021 12:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 9:15 AM tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, October 18, 2021 8:23 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the comments, the attached v42 patch has the fixes for the same.
> >
> > Thanks for your new patch.
> >
> > I tried your patch and found that the permission check for superuser didn't work.
> >
> > For example:
> > postgres=# create role r1;
> > CREATE ROLE
> > postgres=# grant all privileges on database postgres to r1;
> > GRANT
> > postgres=# set role r1;
> > SET
> > postgres=> create schema s1;
> > CREATE SCHEMA
> > postgres=> create publication pub for all tables in schema s1;
> > CREATE PUBLICATION
> >
> > Role r1 is not superuser, but this role could create publication for all tables in
> schema
> > successfully, I think it is related the following change. List schemaidlist was
> > not assigned yet. I think we should check it later.
> >
>
> It seems this got broken in yesterday's patch version. Do you think it
> is a good idea to add a test for this case?
>

Agreed. Thanks for your suggestion.

I tried to add this test to publication.sql, a patch diff file for this test is attached.

Regards
Tang

Attachment Content-Type Size
Topup-permissions-test_diff application/octet-stream 1.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-10-19 06:18:24 Re: can we add subscription TAP test option "vcregress subscriptioncheck" for MSVC builds?
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-10-19 05:51:36 Re: Inconsistent behavior of pg_dump/pg_restore on DEFAULT PRIVILEGES