From: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: [BUG]Invalidate relcache when setting REPLICA IDENTITY |
Date: | 2021-11-12 02:45:57 |
Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB5716EF9B2577406432327F6994959@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday, November 12, 2021 8:15 AM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
> I reviewed your patch and I think the fix could be simplified by
>
> if (OidIsValid(indexOid))
> CacheInvalidateRelcache(rel);
>
> If indexOid is valid it is a REPLICA IDENTITY INDEX. A few lines above there is
> a check for a valid indexOid that makes sure the index is already marked as a
> replica identity; if so, it bail out. If it is not, the relation should be
> invalidated. Am I missing something?
Thanks for reviewing !
But I am not sure it's better to simplify the code like
"if (OidIsValid(indexOid)) CacheInvalidate". After this change, it will
also invalidate the relcache when changing REPLICA IDENTITY from
DEFAULT/FULL/NOTHING to USING INDEX which I think is unnecessary, because the
invalidate for these cases was already handled by
"CatalogTupleUpdate(pg_class".
So, I still think the flag need_rel_inval is needed.
> I also modified your test case to include a DELETE command, wait the initial
> table sync to avoid failing a subsequent test and improve some comments.
Thanks!
Attach the patch which changed the code use need_rel_inval flag.
Also ran pgperltidy for the testcases. I will post patches for backbranch
if there are no more comments.
Best regards,
Hou zj
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-Invalidate-relcache-entry-when-changing-REPLICA-IDEN.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2021-11-12 03:18:27 | Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-11-12 01:58:22 | Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks |