From: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: Parallel Inserts (WAS: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks..) |
Date: | 2021-07-30 13:23:40 |
Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB57168172E6D5B6EE2FC3528194EC9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday, July 30, 2021 2:52 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 4:02 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > Besides, I think we need a new default value about parallel dml
> > > safety. Maybe 'auto' or 'null'(different from
> > > safe/restricted/unsafe). Because, user is likely to alter the safety
> > > to the default value to get the automatic safety check, a independent default
> > > value can make it more clear.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm, but auto won't work for partitioned tables, right? If so, that
> > might appear like an inconsistency to the user and we need to document
> > the same. Let me summarize the discussion so far in this thread so
> > that it is helpful to others.
> >
>
> To avoid that inconsistency, UNSAFE could be the default for partitioned tables
> (and we would disallow setting AUTO for these).
> So then AUTO is the default for non-partitioned tables only.
I think this approach is reasonable, +1.
Best regards,
houzj
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-07-30 13:27:23 | param 'txn' not used in function maybe_send_schema() |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-07-30 12:39:15 | Re: needless complexity in StartupXLOG |