| From: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
| Date: | 2022-12-13 13:07:09 |
| Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB57167EC0CB469325788CA79194E39@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 7:06 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Some minor review comments for v58-0001
Thanks for your comments.
> ======
>
> .../replication/logical/applyparallelworker.c
>
> 1. pa_can_start
>
> + /*
> + * Don't start a new parallel worker if user has set skiplsn as it's
> + * possible that user want to skip the streaming transaction. For
> + streaming
> + * transaction, we need to serialize the transaction to a file so
> + that we
> + * can get the last LSN of the transaction to judge whether to skip
> + before
> + * starting to apply the change.
> + */
> + if (!XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(MySubscription->skiplsn))
> + return false;
>
>
> "that user want" -> "that they want"
>
> "For streaming transaction," -> "For streaming transactions,"
Changed.
> ~~~
>
> 2. pa_free_worker_info
>
> + /* Remove from the worker pool. */
> + ParallelApplyWorkerPool = list_delete_ptr(ParallelApplyWorkerPool,
> + winfo);
>
> Unnecessary wrapping
Changed.
> ~~~
>
> 3. pa_set_stream_apply_worker
>
> +/*
> + * Set the worker that required to apply the current streaming transaction.
> + */
> +void
> +pa_set_stream_apply_worker(ParallelApplyWorkerInfo *winfo) {
> +stream_apply_worker = winfo; }
>
> Comment wording seems wrong.
Tried to improve this comment.
> ======
>
> src/include/replication/worker_internal.h
>
> 4. ParallelApplyWorkerShared
>
> + * XactLastCommitEnd from the parallel apply worker. This is required
> +to
> + * update the lsn_mappings by leader worker.
> + */
> + XLogRecPtr last_commit_end;
> +} ParallelApplyWorkerShared;
>
>
> "This is required to update the lsn_mappings by leader worker." -->
> did you mean "This is required by the leader worker so it can update
> the lsn_mappings." ??
Changed.
Also thanks for the kind reminder in [1], rebased the patch set.
Attach the new patch set.
Best regards,
Hou zj
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Isaac Morland | 2022-12-13 13:25:04 | Re: Ordering behavior for aggregates |
| Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-12-13 13:07:06 | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |