RE: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication

From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication
Date: 2024-08-19 03:38:47
Message-ID: OS0PR01MB5716736A0D4AEE934D3CC6BA948C2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Friday, August 16, 2024 7:47 PM Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I think you might misunderstand the behavior of CheckAndReportConflict(),
> > even if it found a conflict, it still inserts the tuple into the index which
> > means the change is anyway applied.
>
> > In the above conditions where a concurrent tuple insertion is removed or
> > rolled back before CheckAndReportConflict, the tuple inserted by apply will
> > remain. There is no need to report anything in such cases as apply was
> > successful.
>
> Yes, thank you for explanation, I was thinking UNIQUE_CHECK_PARTIAL works
> differently.
>
> But now I think DirtySnapshot-related bug is a blocker for this feature then,
> I'll reply into original after rechecking it.

Based on your response in the original thread[1], where you confirmed that the
dirty snapshot bug does not impact the detection of insert_exists conflicts, I
assume we are in agreement that this bug is not a blocker for the detection
feature. If you think otherwise, please feel free to let me know.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANtu0oh69b%2BVCiASX86dF_eY%3D9%3DA2RmMQ_%2B0%2BuxZ_Zir%2BoNhhw%40mail.gmail.com

Best Regards,
Hou zj

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-08-19 03:43:56 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Previous Message shveta malik 2024-08-19 03:37:51 Re: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication