From: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Unused function parameter in get_qual_from_partbound() |
Date: | 2021-06-09 00:28:48 |
Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB57163D1C960B3B038B25A51494369@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, June 8, 2021 7:30 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 21:50, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > I noticed that the first function parameter in
> > get_qual_from_partbound(**Relation rel**, Relation parent, is not used in the
> function.
> >
> > Is it better to remove it like the attached patch ?
>
> Going by [1] it was used when it went in. It looks like it was for mapping attribute
> numbers between parent and partition rels.
>
> Going by [2], it looks like it became unused due to the attribute mapping code
> being moved down into map_partition_varattnos().
>
> As for whether we should remove it or not, because it's an external function
> that an extension might want to use, it would need to wait until at least we
> branch for PG15.
>
> Likely it's best to add the patch to the July commitfest so that we can make a
> decision then.
OK, Thanks for the explanation.
Added to CF: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/3159/
Best regards,
houzj
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2021-06-09 00:33:31 | Re: alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-06-09 00:18:18 | Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic |