RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply

From: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date: 2022-12-05 04:29:30
Message-ID: OS0PR01MB571639E4141EBF8A2C501E6994189@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sunday, December 4, 2022 7:17 PM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
>
> Thursday, December 1, 2022 8:40 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Some other comments:
> ...
> Attach the new version patch set which addressed most of the comments
> received so far except some comments being discussed[1].
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS0PR01MB57167BF64FC0891734C8E81A94149%40OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com

Attach a new version patch set which fixed a testcase failure on CFbot.

Best regards,
Hou zj

Attachment Content-Type Size
v56-0005-Add-a-main_worker_pid-to-pg_stat_subscription.patch application/octet-stream 8.7 KB
v56-0001-Perform-streaming-logical-transactions-by-parall.patch application/octet-stream 194.8 KB
v56-0002-Serialize-partial-changes-to-a-file-when-the-att.patch application/octet-stream 39.7 KB
v56-0003-Test-streaming-parallel-option-in-tap-test.patch application/octet-stream 80.1 KB
v56-0004-Retry-to-apply-streaming-xact-only-in-apply-work.patch application/octet-stream 22.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2022-12-05 04:36:44 Re: Optimize common expressions in projection evaluation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-12-05 04:27:57 Re: Optimize common expressions in projection evaluation