From: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Date: | 2023-10-26 14:41:03 |
Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB57160DF709ACD02248DB830C94DDA@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
The BF animal fairywren[1] failed when testing
003_upgrade_logical_replication_slots.pl.
From the log, I can see pg_upgrade failed to open the
invalid_logical_replication_slots.txt:
# Checking for valid logical replication slots
# could not open file "C:/tools/nmsys64/home/pgrunner/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.build/testrun/pg_upgrade/003_upgrade_logical_replication_slots/data/t_003_upgrade_logical_replication_slots_new_publisher_data/pgdata/pg_upgrade_output.d/20231026T112558.309/invalid_logical_replication_slots.txt": No such file or directory
# Failure, exiting
The reason could be the length of this path(262) exceed the windows path
limit(260 IIRC). If so, I recall we fixed similar things before (e213de8e7) by
reducing the path somehow.
In this case, I think one approach is to reduce the file and testname to
xxx_logical_slots instead of xxx_logical_replication_slots. But we will analyze more
and share fix soon.
[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=fairywren&dt=2023-10-26%2009%3A04%3A54
Best Regards,
Hou zj
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-10-26 14:49:55 | Re: Does UCS_BASIC have the right CTYPE? |
Previous Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2023-10-26 14:36:07 | Re: Guiding principle for dropping LLVM versions? |