From: | Jayadevan M <Jayadevan(dot)Maymala(at)ibsplc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
Cc: | "PGSQL Performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Query performance issue |
Date: | 2011-08-31 11:57:21 |
Message-ID: | OFF9E19B04.1A7DCA9C-ON652578FD.00419BFE-652578FD.0041AD11@ibsplc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>
> A really interesting part is the sort near the bottom -
>
> -> Sort (cost=1895.95..1896.49 rows=215 width=61) (actual
> time=25.926..711784.723 rows=2673340321 loops=1)
> Sort Key: memmst.memshpsta
> Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 206kB
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.01..1887.62 rows=215 width=61) (actual
> time=0.088..23.445 rows=1121 loops=1)
>
> How can a sort ge 1121 rows at the input and return 2673340321 rows at
the
> output? Not sure where this comes from.
>
> BTW what PostgreSQL version is this?
PostgreSQL 9.0.4 on x86_64-pc-solaris2.10
Regards,
Jayadevan
DISCLAIMER:
"The information in this e-mail and any attachment is intended only for
the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly
contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original communication.
IBS makes no warranty, express or implied, nor guarantees the accuracy,
adequacy or completeness of the information contained in this email or any
attachment and is not liable for any errors, defects, omissions, viruses
or for resultant loss or damage, if any, direct or indirect."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-08-31 12:40:29 | Re: Query performance issue |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-08-31 11:41:55 | Re: Query performance issue |