Re: Query performance issue

From: Jayadevan M <Jayadevan(dot)Maymala(at)ibsplc(dot)com>
To: "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: "PGSQL Performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query performance issue
Date: 2011-08-31 11:57:21
Message-ID: OFF9E19B04.1A7DCA9C-ON652578FD.00419BFE-652578FD.0041AD11@ibsplc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>
> A really interesting part is the sort near the bottom -
>
> -> Sort (cost=1895.95..1896.49 rows=215 width=61) (actual
> time=25.926..711784.723 rows=2673340321 loops=1)
> Sort Key: memmst.memshpsta
> Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 206kB
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.01..1887.62 rows=215 width=61) (actual
> time=0.088..23.445 rows=1121 loops=1)
>
> How can a sort ge 1121 rows at the input and return 2673340321 rows at
the
> output? Not sure where this comes from.
>
> BTW what PostgreSQL version is this?
PostgreSQL 9.0.4 on x86_64-pc-solaris2.10

Regards,
Jayadevan

DISCLAIMER:

"The information in this e-mail and any attachment is intended only for
the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly
contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original communication.
IBS makes no warranty, express or implied, nor guarantees the accuracy,
adequacy or completeness of the information contained in this email or any
attachment and is not liable for any errors, defects, omissions, viruses
or for resultant loss or damage, if any, direct or indirect."

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-08-31 12:40:29 Re: Query performance issue
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2011-08-31 11:41:55 Re: Query performance issue