| From: | Tom(dot)Zschockelt(at)flender(dot)com |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: group role membership |
| Date: | 2005-11-10 14:59:03 |
| Message-ID: | OFE1005195.A69112A7-ONC12570B5.00519386-C12570B5.0052502D@flender.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-support |
>This is possible for <=8.0 groups, and it's a common task to assign a
>bunch of users to a new group/role, so I'm inclined not to agree.
I don't understand this comment.
Do you mean that you disagree in my appreciation that modifying the
underlying data will not
be a high priority aspect or did you disagree with my proposal with the
treectrl ?
>>
>> (An other solution could be a simple reporting solution to get a list
of
>> people who have access to a certain object.)
>An additional "who has which rights on this object" dialog from context
>menu?
yes ( as an additional feature it will be very helpful )
regards
tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-11-10 15:04:19 | Re: group role membership |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-11-10 14:48:20 | Re: group role membership |