From: | Richard_D_Levine(at)Raytheon(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
Cc: | "Pgsql-Admin(at)Postgresql(dot) Org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: NIC to NIC connection |
Date: | 2004-10-19 18:51:58 |
Message-ID: | OFC58838CF.0C2248AE-ON05256F32.006786F3@ftw.us.ray.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
True. I can't imagine a modern server room, even running windows, that
doesn't have a gigabit or fiber backbone for the servers.
Rick
Andrew Sullivan
<ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> To: "Pgsql-Admin(at)Postgresql(dot) Org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>,
Sent by: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
pgsql-admin-owner(at)pos cc:
tgresql.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] NIC to NIC connection
10/19/2004 12:58 PM
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:11:20PM -0500, Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com
wrote:
>
> Depends on the NIC. If your running 100MBS Ether and put in 1GBS Ether
or
> fiber, it would make a difference.
Not if you're not using 100 megs in the first place :)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rosser Schwarz | 2004-10-19 19:57:33 | Re: pgsql database .1 .2 .3 file names |
Previous Message | Ben Kim | 2004-10-19 18:50:40 | Re: NIC to NIC connection |