From: | Richard_D_Levine(at)Raytheon(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, "David Parker" <dparker(at)tazznetworks(dot)com>, "postgres general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: rollback vs. commit for closing read-only transaction |
Date: | 2005-04-26 13:20:06 |
Message-ID: | OF9DE23174.03AB465F-ON05256FEF.00491713-05256FEF.004940BB@ftw.us.ray.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
For portability's sake commit successful transactions and rollback those
that fail.
Rick
pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote on 04/25/2005 05:53:11 PM:
> "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> writes:
> > Probably, turning fsync off would be helpful, since you know it is
> > read-only.
>
> Wouldn't make any difference: a transaction that hasn't modified the
> database doesn't bother to write any commit/abort WAL record at all.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rich Shepard | 2005-04-26 13:24:43 | Re: Migrating MySQL app to postgres? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-04-26 13:10:17 | Re: savepoints |