Re: HACKERS[PROPOSAL] split ProcArrayLock into multiple parts

NP, Sokolov --

pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote on 06/05/2017 03:26:46 PM:

> From: Sokolov Yura <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
> To: Jim Van Fleet <vanfleet(at)us(dot)ibm(dot)com>
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Date: 06/05/2017 03:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HACKERS[PROPOSAL] split ProcArrayLock into
> multiple parts
> Sent by: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
> Excuse me, Jim.
>
> I was tired and misunderstand proposal: I thought of ProcArray
> sharding, but proposal is about ProcArrayLock sharding.
>
> BTW, I just posted improvement to LWLock:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/
> 2968c0be065baab8865c4c95de3f435c%40postgrespro.ru
>
> Would you mind to test against that and together with that?

I will give them a try ..

Jim