From: | Suvankar Roy <suvankar(dot)roy(at)tcs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Performance comparison between Postgres and Greenplum |
Date: | 2009-07-13 11:23:41 |
Message-ID: | OF2EBBDB72.9891A893-ON652575F2.0037D572-652575F2.003E5221@tcs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
I have some 99,000 records in a table (OBSERVATION_ALL) in a Postgres DB
as well as a Greenplum DB.
The Primary key is a composite one comprising of 2 columns (so_no,
serial_no).
The execution of the following query takes 8214.016 ms in Greenplum but
only 729.134 ms in Postgres.
select * from observation_all order by so_no, serial_no;
I believe that execution time in greenplum should be less compared to
postgres. Can anybody throw some light, it would be of great help.
Regards,
Suvankar Roy
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained in this e-mail message
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
immediately and permanently delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew Wakeling | 2009-07-13 12:21:25 | Re: Res: Cost performace question |
Previous Message | paulo matadr | 2009-07-10 19:33:08 | Res: Cost performace question |