Re: :PgSQL: More Queestions

>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:30:00PM -0800, David Wheeler wrote:
> > On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 06:53 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
> >
> > >>But if I change it (as I'm seriously considering, in light of
> > >>PostgreSQL 7.3's support for prepared statements), I'll probably do no
> > >>parsing for comments.
> > >
> > >I think that would be a bad move.
> >
> > Yes, your last post makes very clear why. Thanks.
> >
> > >If it's seen the start of a string ("..." or '...') then it just
> > >keeps copying the string till it finds the same type of quote
> > >character to mark the end of the string. The 'fiddly bit in the
> > >middle' is handling backslashes used to escape quote chars in the
> > >middle of the string: "...\"..." and "...\\" (odd vs even number).
> >
> > Seems rather opaque. Maybe I'm just reflecting my C-newbieness, but why
> > wouldn't this work as well? Borrowing a bit from DBD::ODBC here (but
> > allowing for both kinds of escaping of the quote characters):
> >
> > if (*src == '"' || *src == '\'') {
> > if (!in_literal) {
> > literal_ch = *src;
> > in_literal = 1;
>
> No need for in_literal as literal_ch can serve as a flag as well.

True...I was hacking that in and overlooked it.

>
> > } else {
> > if (*src == literal_ch && *(src-1) != '//'
> > && *(src-1) != literal_ch) {
> > in_literal = 0;
> > }
> > }
> > }
>
> Can't distinguish between
> "....\\\\" - final double quote ends the string
> "...\\\\\" - final double quote is escaped and string
> continues...
>
> If the original code isn't broken it doesn't need fixing, maybe
> just commenting.

I'm tempted to leave it, since nobody is complaining, at the moment...but
I'll put it on the list.

Jeff