| From: | "Matt Clark" <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: LVM snapshots |
| Date: | 2003-03-14 17:46:24 |
| Message-ID: | OAEAKHEHCMLBLIDGAFELIEBADBAA.matt@ymogen.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
A search for 'netapp' or 'lvm' doesn't seem to throw anything relevant up on any of the lists, and I can't *see* any likely threads
in this group for Jan, Feb or March. I'm probably just being blind - can anyone recall the Subject: of the thread?
Cheers
Matt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 14 March 2003 17:17
> To: Matt Clark
> Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] LVM snapshots
>
>
> "Matt Clark" <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net> writes:
> > Has anyone tried taking an LVM snapshot of a running DB? And then reverting
> > to the snapshot? I presume one would need to take a low level backup (i.e.
> > using dd, not tar or cp) of the snapshot to preserve the precise FS layout,
> > but are there any other issues?
>
> This was discussed only a couple weeks ago (in the context of a similar
> facility in NetApp servers, but I believe LVM was mentioned). See the
> archives.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Trewern, Ben | 2003-03-14 17:54:45 | Re: LVM snapshots |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-14 17:17:15 | Re: LVM snapshots |