From: | "Matt Clark" <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Frequent 'deadlock detected' in 7.4 ... or just my bad |
Date: | 2004-04-05 17:41:20 |
Message-ID: | OAEAKHEHCMLBLIDGAFELCENEFDAA.matt@ymogen.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
> 1. a traffic table is read in, and loaded into a hash table that is
> ordered by company_id, ip_id and port:
>
> $traffic{$ip_rec{$ip}{'company_id'}}{$ip_id}{$port} += $bytes1 + $bytes2;
>
> 2. a foreach loop is run on that resultant list to do the updates to the
> database:
>
> foreach $company_id ( keys %traffic ) {
> foreach $ip_id ( keys %{$traffic{$company_id}} ) {
> foreach $port ( keys %{$traffic{$company_id}{$ip_id}} ) {
>
> and the updates are done based on those 3 values, plus the byte value
> of $traffic{$company_id}{$ip_id}{$port} ...
>
> Now, my first mistake may be that I'm mis-assuming that the hashes will
> be read in a sorted order ... ? If this is the case, though, then sort
> order shouldn't be an issue, as all servers would be sorted the same way
The output of keys(%hash) is NOT ordered! Try:
foreach $company_id ( sort keys %traffic ) {
foreach $ip_id ( sort keys %{$traffic{$company_id}} ) {
foreach $port ( sort keys %{$traffic{$company_id}{$ip_id}} ) {
Matt
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anjan Dave | 2004-04-05 18:03:13 | Re: Use 7.4.1's pg_dump in 7.2.4? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-04-05 17:41:18 | Re: Frequent 'deadlock detected' in 7.4 ... or just my bad code? |