From: | "Peter Darley" <pdarley(at)kinesis-cem(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: upgrade to 7.2 & pgdumpall |
Date: | 2002-02-20 19:24:51 |
Message-ID: | NNEAICKPNOGDBHNCEDCPIELLCEAA.pdarley@kinesis-cem.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jean-Michel,
Just to make sure I'm not screwing something up, if I've started using
pgAdmin2 and stopped using pgAdmin, I can drop all the pgadmin_*
tables/views/functions/etc. from my databases with no ill effects, right?
Thanks,
Peter Darley
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Jean-Michel
POURE
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:58 AM
To: Ben-Nes Michael
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] upgrade to 7.2 & pgdumpall
Le Mercredi 20 Février 2002 10:12, Ben-Nes Michael a écrit :
> Amazing, I didn't knew that pgadmin install tables & function in my DB & I
> don't really like it.
>
> But still if it was legal relation in 7.1.3 why its not legal in 7.2 ?
> And what with the oid error ?
>
> Does pgadmin II install relations of its own in the DB too ?
> That strange as client suppose to be passive toward the server.
Dear Michael,
pgAdmin2 has its own abstraction layer called pgSchema. There are no
supplementary relations needed. So, do not hesitate to upgrade to pgAdmin2
at
http://pgadmin.postgresql.org.
Cheers,
Jean-Michel POURE
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hugo Coolens | 2002-02-20 19:36:44 | access database conversion |
Previous Message | Hugo Coolens | 2002-02-20 19:23:58 | tutorial, missing file |