From: | Jason Hihn <jhihn(at)paytimepayroll(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Baguette <bruno(dot)baguette(at)netcourrier(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2003-01-20 14:42:03 |
Message-ID: | NGBBLHANMLKMHPDGJGAPOEBECBAA.jhihn@paytimepayroll.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
It's OLD anyway - almost a year. And they obviously were only using Windows
to test on, so it couldn't have been a serious test ;-)
Just another reason to have native windows support... ahem. ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Bruno Baguette
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 8:50 AM
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Server Databases Clash : NO mention of
PostgreSQL ?
Hello,
Does somebody knows why this eWeek article that does a benchmark of
theses Databases (DB2 7.2 ,SQL Server, MySQL,Oracle9i and ASE) whithout
having added PostgreSQL ?
Here's the URL of the article :
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,293,00.asp
Thanks in advance !
-------------------------------------------------
Bruno BAGUETTE - bruno(dot)baguette(at)netcourrier(dot)com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heather Carle | 2003-01-20 14:46:38 | LinuxWorld/Computerworld story on PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-01-20 08:24:37 | Re: Server Databases Clash : NO mention of PostgreSQL ? |