From: | Jason Hihn <jhihn(at)paytimepayroll(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pgsql-Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Linux world Article |
Date: | 2002-12-24 15:04:20 |
Message-ID: | NGBBLHANMLKMHPDGJGAPCELACAAA.jhihn@paytimepayroll.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Ok, now that we've all had a chance to read it...
Do we know why Apple chose MySQL?
Are these statements true?
"But when it comes to core SQL capabilities, open-source databases do not
support all the features that proprietary enterprise databases such as IBM's
DB2 or Oracle's 9i do."
"Open-source database providers readily admit that their databases are not
yet geared toward powering high-end enterprise systems, such as ERP and CRM
applications."
I could see that being applied to MySQL, but I thought PostgreSQL was ready!
-J
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Jason Hihn
Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 9:13 AM
To: Pgsql-Advocacy
Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Linux world Article
MySQL and PostgreSQL vs. the commercial offerings.
http://linuxworld.com.au/news.php3?nid=2095&tid=1
MySQL gets most of the spotlight, though. >:-(
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Langille | 2002-12-24 15:15:10 | Re: Linux world Article |
Previous Message | Jason Hihn | 2002-12-24 14:13:28 | Linux world Article |