From: | "Nick Fankhauser" <nickf(at)ontko(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "AgentM" <agentm(at)cmu(dot)edu>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: throw SQLException on no rs.next()? |
Date: | 2002-04-23 12:09:24 |
Message-ID: | NEBBLAAHGLEEPCGOBHDGGEFDENAA.nickf@ontko.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Yes, it sure does. The way I usually handle stepping through a ResultSet is
with a structure like this:
/* create REsultSet results */
while (results.next())
{
/*do something with results*/
}
You're right about this being a common newbie gotcha. I'll add it to the
newbie FAQ.
-NF
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of AgentM
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:36 AM
> To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [JDBC] throw SQLException on no rs.next()?
>
>
> Hi- it's me the JDBC newbie again and I have a simple request. Could
> a call to resultset.getX() throw some exception if rs.next() has not
> yet been called? I just got horribly burned by missing this simple
> thing and I think it may be helpful to other newbies to have this
> extra bit of information. Thanks.
> --
> ><><><><><><><><><><><><
> AgentM
> agentm(at)cmu(dot)edu
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2002-04-23 12:23:24 | Re: throw SQLException on no rs.next()? |
Previous Message | rob | 2002-04-23 12:04:12 | Re: throw SQLException on no rs.next()? |