| From: | "Nick Fankhauser" <nickf(at)ontko(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jean-Michel Chabanne" <jeanmichel(dot)chabanne(at)free(dot)fr>, <nickf(at)ontko(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-admin" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG_dump fatal error (second post) |
| Date: | 2003-07-21 19:57:02 |
| Message-ID: | NEBBLAAHGLEEPCGOBHDGAEMDHMAA.nickf@ontko.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
> prod.dump.tar is the result of pg_dump, not a command, as for
> your text sample below.
> "pg_dump -Ft prod > prod.dump.tar" would be better.
Jean-Michel-
I'm sorry- that was a typo in my original post that I should have corrected.
The actual command that I'm using is in fact "pg_dump -Ft prod >
prod.dump.tar"
Here is a snip from the console log on the second machine that I'm using to
diagnose with:
nickf(at)morgai:~$ pg_dump -Ft alpha > dump.tar
pg_dump: [tar archiver] could not write to tar member (wrote 110, attempted
398)
nickf(at)morgai:~$
nickf(at)morgai:~$
nickf(at)morgai:~$ ls -al dump.tar
-rw-r--r-- 1 nickf nickf 1388367872 Jul 21 14:49 dump.tar
nickf(at)morgai:~$
Note also that the file size is well under 2GB.
Thanks for looking it over.
-Nick
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Deugau | 2003-07-21 21:21:50 | Re: Postgresql broken with Red Hat 9? |
| Previous Message | Jean-Michel Chabanne | 2003-07-21 19:32:55 | Re: PG_dump fatal error (second post) |