From: | "Nick Fankhauser" <nickf(at)ontko(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Uma Natarajan" <unat(at)engin(dot)umich(dot)edu>, "PostgreSQL -jdbc" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Filemaker, PostgreSQL, JDBC and Webobjects |
Date: | 2002-02-20 18:57:43 |
Message-ID: | NEBBLAAHGLEEPCGOBHDGAEEPEGAA.nickf@ontko.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
It would seem that if there is a way to access filemaker via Java, this
would be possible, but if all of your data lives on the filemaker system,
how does adding postgresql to the mix add value? Can you explain a bit more
about the motivation for this approach?
-Nick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Uma Natarajan
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:33 PM
> To: PostgreSQL -jdbc
> Subject: [JDBC] Filemaker, PostgreSQL, JDBC and Webobjects
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We have a filemaker solution that we have sunk a lot of money and time
> into.
> We would like to use Webobjects as the web application server, connect
> to PostgreSQL via JDBC, and, --- here's the tricky part, --- ask
> PostgreSQL (maybe through stored procedures and more JDBC) to access /
> update our Filemaker database files --- all as the same transaction and
> back to the Webobjects front end.
>
> Is this possible at all?
>
> Thanks
> Uma
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henry | 2002-02-20 19:19:14 | alternative to postgresql |
Previous Message | Uma Natarajan | 2002-02-20 18:33:08 | Filemaker, PostgreSQL, JDBC and Webobjects |