From: | "Joe Shevland" <shevlandj(at)kpi(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Barry Lind" <barry(at)xythos(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Patch to improve commit time performance and a few other things |
Date: | 2001-08-02 04:36:13 |
Message-ID: | NEBBKPJCEMMGFBLGLENGGEDFCIAA.shevlandj@kpi.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
Great stuff, be keen to see how it affects some apps I've written with blob's (all blob stuff is wrapped in the commit block).
Just thinking about it (and too lazy to go and check :P), do we have a regression test setup for the JDBC stuff so changes like #3 mentioned can be verified easily (ie compilation against the different JDK's)? Maybe a test environment set up on the main server where people do the cvs commits, as I assume this means they have a shell account as well.
Cheers,
Joe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Lind [mailto:barry(at)xythos(dot)com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 2:08 PM
> To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [JDBC] Patch to improve commit time performance and a few other
> things
>
>
> Attached is a patch that does the following:
>
> 1) improves performance of commit/rollback by reducing number of round
> trips to the server
> 2) uses 7.1 functionality for setting the transaction isolation level
> 3) backs out a patch from 11 days ago because that code failed to
> compile under jdk1.1
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-08-02 10:41:53 | Re: Re: What needs to be done? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-02 04:17:10 | Re: Re: What needs to be done? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-08-02 10:15:26 | Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-02 04:18:19 | Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" |