| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Crash during WAL recovery? |
| Date: | 2000-11-22 01:14:23 |
| Message-ID: | NEBBIOAJBMEENKACLNPCEEIKCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Is there any particular reason the spelling and punctuation in the code
snippet below is so bad?
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 6:04 AM
> To: PostgreSQL Development
> Subject: [HACKERS] Crash during WAL recovery?
>
>
> This snippet in xlog.c makes we wonder...
>
> else if (ControlFile->state == DB_IN_RECOVERY)
> {
> elog(LOG, "Data Base System was interrupted being
> in recovery at %s\n"
> "\tThis propably means that some data
> blocks are corrupted\n"
> "\tAnd you will have to use last backup
> for recovery",
> str_time(ControlFile->time));
> }
>
> I thought this was going to be crash safe.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-11-22 01:27:07 | RE: Crash during WAL recovery? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-22 01:14:18 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumplo (README.pg_dumplo lo_export.c lo_import.c main.c pg_dumplo.h utils.c) |