Re: 7.3b1 installation

From: "philip johnson" <philip(dot)johnson(at)atempo(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.3b1 installation
Date: 2002-09-06 09:46:52
Message-ID: NDBBJLHHAKJFNNCGFBHLCEHJDPAA.philip.johnson@atempo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

where can I find the 7.3 b1 sources

-----Message d'origine-----
De : pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]De la part de Thomas O'Dowd
Envoyé : vendredi 6 septembre 2002 11:29
À : Jeff Davis
Cc : Tom Lane; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org; Bruce Momjian
Objet : Re: [GENERAL] 7.3b1 installation

Jeff,

I imagine that this was the variable JAVA_HOME? The current
configuration seems to assume that you have this set. The configure
script should probably check that this variable to be set to a directory
and ask the user to set this first instead of failing with the vague
message that Ant doesn't work.

Probably something like this...

if test ! -d "$JAVA_HOME" ; then
AC_MSG_ERROR([Set JAVA_HOME variable to build Java components])
fi

This could be done before the path test in configure.in?

Tom.

On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 05:52, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Oh, I see. I found the problem. My environment variables appearently
weren't
> set right, so when it tested ant, it got an error with the java compiler,
and
> exited with nonzero. So, I guess technically ant was working fine, but the
> java compiler wasn't. Thanks for the test case, Tom, and for the advice
from
> all who responded.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
> On Thursday 05 September 2002 01:20 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-general(at)empires(dot)org> writes:
> > > I have ant 1.5 already.
> > >
> > > When I run "./configure --with-java" I get:
> > > ----
> > > checking whether /usr/bin/ant works... no
> > > configure: error: ant does not work
> > > ----
> >
> > Hmph. Well, the test that configure is running seems pretty
> > straightforward:
> >
> > cat > conftest.java << EOF
> > public class conftest {
> > int testmethod(int a, int b) {
> > return a + b;
> > }
> > }
> > EOF
> >
> > cat > conftest.xml << EOF
> > <project name="conftest" default="conftest">
> > <target name="conftest">
> > <javac srcdir="." includes="conftest.java">
> > </javac>
> > </target>
> > </project>
> > EOF
> >
> > pgac_cmd='$ANT -buildfile conftest.xml 1>&2'
> > { (eval echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \"$pgac_cmd\"") >&5
> > (eval $pgac_cmd) 2>&5
> > ac_status=$?
> > echo "$as_me:$LINENO: \$? = $ac_status" >&5
> > (exit $ac_status); }
> > pgac_save_status=$?
> > if test $? = 0 && test -f ./conftest.class ; then
> > pgac_cv_prog_ant_works=yes
> > else
> > echo "configure: failed java program was:" >&5
> > cat conftest.java >&5
> > echo "configure: failed build file was:" >&5
> > cat conftest.xml >&5
> > pgac_cv_prog_ant_works=no
> > fi
> >
> > In English, that's creating conftest.java and conftest.xml and then
> > running "/usr/bin/ant -buildfile conftest.xml". If ant returns nonzero
> > exit status or doesn't create conftest.class, then it's considered
> > broken. What happens if you try the same thing by hand?
> >
> > (Alternatively, look into the config.log to see what configure thought
> > happened.)
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
tom(at)nooper(dot)com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wollny 2002-09-06 09:48:01 Re: Problem with restoring dump (may be tsearch-related)
Previous Message Oliver Elphick 2002-09-06 09:46:12 Re: Date not being parsed as expected