RE: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)
Date: 2000-01-25 16:06:22
Message-ID: NDBBIJLOILGIKBGDINDFCEFHCCAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:e99re41(at)DoCS(dot)UU(dot)SE]
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> > Even default is not allowed in ADD COLUMN now.
> > There may be other reasons why they aren't allowed.
>
> It's not a matter of *allowed*, it's a parsing deficiency. The fact that
> there was a default declared gets silently ignored. If y'all allow ;) I
> would like to fix that (have already started a bit) by perusing the code
> in parse_func.c:transformCreateStmt and do the same for the alter table
> add column part. Maybe and add/drop constraint will come out in the end as
> well.
>

IIRC,there were some reason that default for new column had been rejected.
It may be possible now.
Probably Tom knows it.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-25 16:35:20 Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-01-25 16:01:25 Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)