From: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | "Christof Petig" <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining |
Date: | 1999-12-10 15:33:36 |
Message-ID: | NDBBIJLOILGIKBGDINDFAEHICBAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Christof Petig
>
> Hello,
>
> I'll donate some (read all freely available) of my spare time to
> implementing tuple
> chaining. It looks like this feature is most wanted and it would be a
> pity to hold this until post 7.0. Personally I don't need it, yet ...
> But I will definitely find a use for it once available ;-) And it looks
> like a good start for hacking on pgsql.
>
> I already dived into the depth of pgsql's page and tuple structures and
> it looks like it is possible. But before I start coding I would like to
> hear some more experienced opinions on how to implement it.
>
Will you put a long tuple into a long logical page(continued multiple
phisical(?) pages) ?
I'm suspicious about the way that allows non-page-formatted page.
Anyway it would need a big change around bufmgr/smgr etc.
Could someone estimate the influence/danger before going forward ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-12-10 15:41:12 | Re: [HACKERS] insert using select with limit |
Previous Message | Peter Mount | 1999-12-10 15:19:33 | RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release |