| From: | "Tim Mickol" <tmickol(at)combimatrix(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: pg_dumpall anomaly |
| Date: | 2001-06-12 19:24:38 |
| Message-ID: | NCEEJEAEIDNFKBMALPGMMEFCCDAA.tmickol@combimatrix.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
no possibility that it was a locally modified script. pg_dumpall came
straight out of the 7.1.2-2 PGDG binary rpm
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 12:11 AM
To: tmickol(at)combimatrix(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dumpall anomaly
"Tim Mickol" <tmickol(at)combimatrix(dot)com> writes:
> what are the: <schema_name>|<schema_owner>| directives all about?
Good question. They look like an abbreviated select from pg_database,
but pg_dumpall shouldn't be doing any such thing. Is it possible you've
got a locally modified pg_dumpall script?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-06-12 19:30:47 | Re: linking tables |
| Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2001-06-12 19:18:41 | Re: Oracle news article |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | GH | 2001-06-12 19:35:13 | Re: Re: [SQL] maximum number of rows in table - what about oid limits? |
| Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2001-06-12 19:08:38 | Re: Help me speed things up... |